500-800 LOs meet here every work day
Now is the time to jump on board
Click HERE to get the meeting link
* * * * *
The Housing Crisis: A Key Issue in the Presidential Debate
As we gear up for tonight’s presidential debate, one issue looms larger than any other: housing. It’s not just about having a roof over our heads; it’s the backbone of our economy. Right now, we’re facing a perfect storm:
- Unaffordable housing prices
- Stagnant home sales
- Skyrocketing rents
- Rising cost of living
- Decreased consumer spending
All of these factors are putting the brakes on our economic engine. So, the million-dollar question is: which candidate has the best solution, and how high does this issue rank on their priority list?
Let’s face it – neither candidate has truly excelled in addressing this crisis so far. However, after digging into their proposed solutions, it’s clear they have vastly different approaches. Let’s break them down:
Trump’s Housing Plan:
- Slash regulations: Trump argues that regulations account for 30% of new home costs. He plans to eliminate these, potentially reducing home prices significantly.
- Open federal lands: Proposing large-scale housing construction on federal land with minimal taxes and regulations.
- Immigration impact: Trump plans to prohibit illegal immigrants from obtaining mortgages, citing the influx of 21 million illegal aliens as a factor driving up housing costs.
- Addressing foreign investors: While not explicitly stated, there’s a suggestion to tackle the issue of foreign investors buying up American homes.
Harris’s Housing Plan:
- Increase housing supply: Aims to construct 3 million new housing units for both rent and purchase.
- Housing innovation fund: Proposes doubling the Biden Administration’s $20 billion fund to support innovative construction financing methods.
- Curb Wall Street influence: Focuses on preventing large-scale investors from buying and marking up homes in bulk.
- Multifamily focus: Emphasizes the construction of apartments for both rent and purchase.
Analysis:
Trump’s plan focuses on deregulation and land availability, potentially lowering construction costs by 40-50%. This could lead to 30-40% lower home prices, potentially stimulating both building and buying. However, the plan’s emphasis on restricting illegal immigrants’ access to mortgages is controversial.
Harris’s plan centers on increasing housing supply, particularly in the multifamily sector. While addressing the estimated 8 million unit shortage, it doesn’t directly tackle the issue of existing unsold homes. The focus on rental properties and “affordable” solutions might not fully address the needs of aspiring homeowners.
Both plans have their merits and drawbacks. Trump’s approach might lead to quicker results but could face environmental and social challenges. Harris’s plan takes a longer-term view but might not provide immediate relief to the current crisis.
As we watch the debate tonight, keep in mind that housing isn’t just about having a place to live – it’s the foundation of our economy. We need solutions that address both immediate affordability concerns and long-term sustainability.
What do you think? Which approach do you believe will be more effective in solving our housing crisis? Share your thoughts in the comments below, and let’s keep this crucial conversation going.
