Protect your customer data from ‘flowing’ into parent company solicitations with other mortgage software.
Today is a good day to evaluate your technology and read the fine print!
Click HERE for a short demo and learn how we do it better than everyone else.
Keller Williams and its co-founder Gary Keller are facing serious accusations of embezzlement and racketeering in an amended lawsuit complaint. The allegations contend that Keller Williams imposed excessive fees on franchisees which were then used to enrich Gary Keller and fund other Keller-owned businesses.
I can attest firsthand to the closed ecosystem and tightly controlled vendor relationships within Keller Williams. As a past vendor trying to work with Keller, I saw how they leverage their large agent base and influential brand to extract value from partners. We once rented out theaters at the Keller HQ to showcase to agents, but the proposed partnership costs were prohibitively high.
Keller Williams has built an incredibly successful brokerage model and supportive agent community. However, the amended complaint alleges Gary Keller pockets certain fees meant for approved uses and pressures franchisees to buy into Keller’s side businesses like 72Sold. This raises fair questions about transparency and whether success has perhaps bred overreach.
Yet as damning as the allegations appear, the positive impacts of the Keller brand cannot be ignored. Millions of clients and agents have benefited from Keller’s training and community. If found guilty, Keller should be held accountable. But it would be unfortunate if any damages are siphoned away by opportunistic lawyers rather than making harmed franchisees whole.
Ultimately this lawsuit stems from the power and leverage Keller has amassed. They built an enviable market position that vendors and franchisees clamor for access to. The question at stake seems to be at what point does that influence and ecosystem cross over into unfair exploitation? As the case unfolds, it may set an important precedent for when market dominance becomes racketeering.