MLS PIN vs. DOJ: The Battle for Real Estate Commissions

Join the Club!

We’re KILLING sales books every Wednesday.

Click HERE to join.

* * * * *

MLS PIN vs. DOJ: The Battle for Real Estate Commissions

In a bold move that stands in contrast to recent industry trends, MLS PIN (Property Information Network) has announced a significant policy change regarding real estate listings. Effective immediately, listing brokers and agents can submit for-sale listings to the MLS without being required to offer any cooperating compensation to the buyer’s broker. This decision, made about a month ago, upholds the fundamental rights of home sellers while still allowing for flexibility in commission structures.

The key points of this policy change are:

1. Listing agents and home sellers have the freedom to offer whatever compensation they choose, or none at all.
2. MLS PIN will honor and publish the wishes of the home seller, as communicated through their agent.
3. Pre-emptive offers of compensation can still be made through the MLS or other channels.

This approach aligns with the principle that sellers should have control over how they market and sell their property. It’s a refreshing stance in an industry facing increased scrutiny and legal challenges.

However, this decision has not been without controversy. The Department of Justice (DOJ) antitrust division has called for “an injunction that would prohibit sellers from making commission offers to buyer brokers at all.” This stance from the DOJ raises serious concerns about government overreach and potential infringement on constitutional rights.

The DOJ’s position seems to overlook several important factors:

1. Freedom of Speech: Sellers should have the right to communicate their intentions regarding their legally owned property, including offering incentives to potential buyers or their agents.
2. Due Process: The government’s attempt to dictate how property can be sold in private transactions could be seen as a violation of due process, potentially impacting sellers’ ability to maximize their profits.
3. Precedent in Other Industries: The DOJ’s approach to real estate commissions is inconsistent with how similar practices are treated in other industries, such as auction houses or private sales of other goods.

MLS PIN’s stance protects sellers’ rights while adapting to changing market conditions. Their policy ensures that:

1. Sellers are not required to offer compensation or accede to any cooperating broker’s request for compensation.
2. If a seller chooses to offer compensation, it must be disclosed in the listing agreement.
3. The cooperating broker will be considered an intended third-party beneficiary in cases where compensation is offered.

This approach maintains the seller’s freedom to make decisions about their property while providing transparency in the transaction process.

As the real estate industry grapples with these changes, it’s crucial to consider the broader implications. Are we inadvertently trampling on sellers’ constitutional rights in an attempt to reform industry practices? The coming weeks may see agents and brokers adapting to these new rules, but the real story may be how MLS PIN, acting as a David against the industry Goliath, navigates this complex legal and ethical landscape.

In conclusion, while change in the real estate industry is inevitable, it’s essential that reforms protect the rights of all parties involved – especially those of the property owners. MLS PIN’s approach offers a balanced solution that respects seller autonomy while addressing concerns about transparency and fairness in real estate transactions.