Brokers – Make Life Easier

Everything you need in one place. Period.

Enterprise pricing for Everyone – only $99/monthly

Click HERE to see it in action

* * * * *

The Potential Impact of Mass Deportation on U.S. Construction and Housing Costs

Recent discussions about immigration policy and its potential economic impact have raised serious concerns about the future of the U.S. construction industry and housing market. With significant portions of the construction workforce being non-citizens, proposed deportation policies could have far-reaching consequences for housing costs and availability.

Current Workforce Demographics

According to Bloomberg, several construction-related occupations heavily rely on non-citizen workers:

• Plasterers and stucco masons: 49.2% non-citizens
• Concrete workers: 41% non-citizens
• Drywall and tile installers: 38.3% non-citizens

The American Immigration Council reports that nearly a quarter of construction workers in some states are undocumented, highlighting the industry’s dependence on immigrant labor.

The Policy Landscape

During his 2024 campaign, Donald Trump announced plans for what he called the “largest deportation program in American history.” However, the details of this proposed policy remain unclear:

• The campaign hasn’t provided specific implementation details for removing an estimated 11 million undocumented residents
• Trump’s statements to Time magazine suggested targeting between 15-20 million people, though experts suggest the actual number of undocumented immigrants is likely lower
• Former “border czar” Tom Homan has promised “shock and awe” enforcement from day one

Economic Implications

The construction industry is already facing significant labor shortages. A mass deportation program could:

1. Severely impact construction workforce availability
2. Drive up construction costs
3. Increase housing prices, contradicting campaign promises to make housing more affordable

The ITIN Loan Factor

An interesting counterpoint to consider is the existence of ITIN (Individual Taxpayer Identification Number) loans. These mortgages allow non-citizens, both residents and non-residents, to purchase homes in the U.S. without a Social Security number. The established presence of this lending program suggests some level of institutional acceptance of non-citizen home-ownership.

Historical Context

While Trump made similar deportation promises in 2016, his administration’s actual enforcement approach was less extensive than initially proposed. This history might suggest that future policies could be more moderate than campaign rhetoric indicates.

Looking Forward

The reality of implementing mass deportation would likely conflict with other economic goals, particularly in the housing sector. Any policy discussion must consider:

• The practical feasibility of large-scale deportation
• Economic impacts on the construction industry
• Effects on housing affordability
• Broader economic consequences

Conclusion

While immigration policy remains a contentious issue, the economic data suggests that extreme deportation measures could significantly impact the construction industry and housing market. The challenge lies in balancing immigration enforcement with economic stability, particularly in sectors heavily reliant on immigrant labor.

This analysis aims to examine potential economic impacts rather than advocate for specific policies. The ultimate scope and implementation of any immigration policy remains to be seen.