Discretion to Make Exceptions and Get Your Deal Done

Great products & pricing that might surprise you, maybe better than you think!

Connect with an Expert and find out what they can do that big boxes cannot.

Click HERE to speak to an Account Expert.

* * * * *

The Controversy Surrounding Buyer’s Agent Commissions in Real Estate

In today’s real estate market, a significant debate is brewing about the disclosure of buyer’s agent commissions. This issue touches on the core principles of the National Association of Realtors (NAR), the fiduciary duties of real estate agents, and the rights of sellers in the home-selling process. Let’s delve into this complex topic and explore its implications for real estate professionals and homeowners alike.

NAR’s Stance and Its Contradictions

The National Association of Realtors (NAR) has a seemingly contradictory position when it comes to the disclosure of buyer’s agent commissions. On one hand, NAR’s Code of Ethics states:

“Any regulation restricting or limiting practice of a Realtor in the conduct of their business, unless it concerns ethical practice, is an inequitable limitation on its membership.”

This statement suggests that Realtors have autonomy over their business practices, as long as they remain ethical. However, recent directives from NAR have prohibited the posting of buyer’s agent commissions on Multiple Listing Services (MLS), creating a conflict with their own stated principles.

The Seller’s Perspective

From a seller’s point of view, the ability to offer and advertise a commission to the buyer’s agent can be a valuable marketing tool. Many sellers believe that broadcasting this information could help sell their house sooner and potentially at a higher price. As the seller, these are legitimate wishes and strategies for marketing their property.

The Realtor’s Dilemma

Real estate agents find themselves caught between their fiduciary duty to their clients (the sellers) and the directives of their professional association (NAR). This raises an important question: Is it more unethical to broadcast the seller’s wishes regarding commissions or to go against those wishes by not broadcasting them?

NAR itself provides guidance on this matter, stating:

“This interpretation affirms the basic agency relationship between the listing broker and their principal as defined in the listing contract. A board or MLS rule may not properly interfere with or supersede the relationship established by the terms of the agreement between the broker and their principal.”

This statement clearly prioritizes the agent-client relationship over association rules, further complicating the current directive against posting buyer’s agent commissions on the MLS.

The Current Market Context

The importance of this issue is magnified by the current real estate market conditions. With homes sitting on the market longer, increased concessions being offered, and rising mortgage delinquencies, many sales are becoming distressed. Sellers in these situations need every advantage they can get, including the ability to offer and advertise buyer’s agent commissions to facilitate faster sales.

Legal Implications

The contradiction between NAR’s written bylaws and their recent directives has not gone unnoticed. Lawsuits, such as the one filed by agents in Michigan against their MLS and state association, are challenging these restrictions. Based on NAR’s own rules, these legal challenges may have merit.

A Call to Action for Realtors

Given these complexities, what should conscientious real estate professionals do? Here are a few suggestions:

1. Prioritize your fiduciary duty to your clients.
2. Communicate openly with sellers about commission strategies and their wishes.
3. Consider sharing buyer’s agent commission information in all other marketing efforts for the property, even if restricted from the MLS.
4. Stay informed about the ongoing legal challenges and potential changes in NAR policies.

Conclusion

The controversy surrounding buyer’s agent commissions highlights the complex relationship between real estate professionals, their clients, and their governing associations. As the market evolves and legal challenges unfold, it’s crucial for all parties involved to stay informed and prioritize ethical practices that serve the best interests of homebuyers and sellers alike.